Natural Choice and Foreign Policies9559657
It is the mechanism that imposes a collective of conditions and pressures that applies significant adversity on people or groups inside the bounds of the said system. Those with the possible to evolve and prevail are the ones that do not cease to exist. In some cases they even thrive in the stated environment. These who are unfit, meaning these that do not have the potential to transcend present limits and weaknesses are consigned to extinction. This is what is meant by survival of the fittest. Nature itself singles out these that will survive and these that will not.
In the power play of nations, the concept of all-natural choice is also a reality. Component of this Darwinian idea is the idea that the fitter an organism, there is the higher likelihood that it will dominate the atmosphere it is in. It would be elevated to the status of prey. Lesser creatures will either be prey to those who are higher, or they will evolve and be predators themselves. When examining this environment it is apparent that it is similar to the interaction of foreign policies of modern states.
When the foreign policy of a certain country is forced by circumstance to yield to that of another more potent state, there is a political type of predation. Foreign policies are closely reflective of the scheme of all-natural choice. An example of this is in terms of how countries aligned themselves in terms of which world power. The usual and rational option for lesser nations is to attach themselves to much more powerful states. There are many motivations behind this. Nevertheless, they all belong to the realm of survival. Countries behave like their individuals.
In the realm on international relations and foreign policy, lesser states act like prey, they find ways to survive in an environment of many voracious predators. They generally attempt to establish a symbiotic relationship with one to maintain themselves safe from other people. This is the basis of many modern-day alliances. As for world powers, they act like predators. They are at the pinnacle of existence and hold a significant quantity of power of life and death on many other lesser entities. They stay as such till such that they are also singled out for extinction. A dominant power lasts only so lengthy as no other power exists that exceeds it or that the adversity of the environment does not overcome it.
Foreign policies are absolutely nothing more than active manifestations of states to influence their way to survival. If they fail, they fall prey to the many predators in the international arena. Equally sufficient these predatory entities live off the weaker creatures in the international neighborhood. It takes a substantial degree of political maneuvering for a nation to survive in the international politics of today. This is not unlike the development of a creature in its pursuit of indicates to evade eradication and to thrive in a hostile atmosphere.
