Gnificant association between geographic availability and dietary outcomes, while the other

De March of History
Révision de 2 mars 2018 à 09:11 par Camp8winter (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « Among the 14 of 16 studies that examined distance to afood store in relation to diet, three revealed null associations [18,34,41]. Five of the remaining eleven studies sho... »)

(diff) ← Version précédente | Voir la version courante (diff) | Version suivante → (diff)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Among the 14 of 16 studies that examined distance to afood store in relation to diet, three revealed null associations [18,34,41]. Five of the remaining eleven studies showed associations but not always in a consistent direction [23,27,37,38,40]. For instance, Timperio et. al. [40] found that the likelihood of consuming vegetables > = 3 times/day was greater not only the farther children lived from a supermarket (OR = 1.27, 95 CI 1.07-1.51) and but also the farther children lived from FF outlet (OR = 1.19, 95 CI 1.06-1.35). Butein supplier Skidmore et al. [37] reported not only that living further away from a supermarket increased portions of fruit (0.11 portions/week/km increase, p