, suggesting that the species compete for shared niche space within the

De March of History
Révision de 8 mars 2018 à 15:18 par Carpgun92 (discussion | contributions) (Page créée avec « doi:10.1128/AEM.02385-16. Editor: P. D. Schloss, University of Michigan Address correspondence to Larry J., suggesting that the species compete for shared niche space with... »)

(diff) ← Version précédente | Voir la version courante (diff) | Version suivante → (diff)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

doi:10.1128/AEM.02385-16. Editor: P. D. Schloss, University of Michigan Address correspondence to Larry J., suggesting that the species compete for shared niche space within the vagina. Ecological theory predicts that many species can't occupy the identical niche indefinitely, as a single will sooner or later outcompete the other individuals (six). As a result, it is unclear how the 4 Lactobacillus species have been maintained as typical inhabitants on the vaginal niche. Previous research have shown that competing species can partition their shared niche space via a number of mechanisms. One particular such mechanism, termed resource partitioning, happens when competing species specialize within the use of 1568539X-00003152 distinct subsets of sources, thereby Tures on leaves, constant using the higher abundance of Pseudomonas spp. dividing the niche into many niches and allowing them to cooccur (7?). Even so, we argue that it is unlikely that the vaginal lactobacilli are dividing their shared niche space in this way because they rarely cooccur (2). Species also can partition shared niche space temporally through a mechanism termed conditional differentiation. This occurs when the species differ in competitive capability across the niche's selection of environ-Tmental circumstances (ten?2). The abundance on the species is then determined by the abiotic and biotic things that influence their competitive interactions. For instance, in their 2014 function, Mammola and Isaia showed that variation in the temperature and humidity levels in caves permitted two competing spider species to partition their shared niche space (12). We argue that provided the complicated temporal fluctuations exhibited by vaginal Lactobacillus species, these species probably partition their shared niche by means of this mechanism. Within the present study, we characterized and compared the genomes of two in the 4 prominent vaginal Lactobacillus species, L. crispatus and L. iners, to identify achievable ecological aspects that could drive these temporal fluctuations inside the dominant Lactobacillus species.Received 17 August 2016 Accepted 22 September 2016 Accepted manuscript posted on line 30 September 2016 Citation France MT, Mendes-Soares H, Forney LJ. 2016. Genomic comparisons of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners reveal prospective ecological drivers of community composition within the vagina. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:7063?073. doi:10.1128/AEM.02385-16. Editor: P. D. Schloss, University of Michigan Address correspondence to Larry J. Forney, lforney@uidaho.edu., suggesting that the species compete for shared niche space within the vagina. Ecological theory predicts that various species cannot occupy the same niche indefinitely, as one will eventually outcompete the other individuals (six). Hence, it truly is unclear how the 4 Lactobacillus species have already been maintained as common inhabitants of the vaginal niche. Previous studies have shown that competing species can partition their shared niche space by means of a range of mechanisms. A single such mechanism, termed resource partitioning, occurs when competing species specialize in the use of 1568539X-00003152 different subsets of resources, thereby dividing the niche into multiple niches and allowing them to cooccur (7?). Nonetheless, we argue that it's unlikely that the vaginal lactobacilli are dividing their shared niche space within this way simply because they hardly ever cooccur (two). Species can also partition shared niche space temporally via a mechanism termed conditional differentiation. This happens when the species differ in competitive ability across the niche's selection of environ-Tmental conditions (ten?two).