Highest on factor 5 were associated with transmission of infectious diseases (domain : Différence entre versions

De March of History
Aller à : navigation, rechercher
m
m
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
−
The current study developed a 28-item IDSHL with high reliability and validity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to develop an IDSHL tool and test its efficacy in a large population. In this study, the results of the EFA indicated that the 22-item subscale 1 is a well-constructed and acceptable tool for measuring IDSHL. All items had loading values >0.40 and loaded on only one factor, suggesting that the underlying factors are meaningful. The eigenvalues of the five factors ranged from 1.003 to 5.343, and all components accounted for 46.27  of the total variance, indicating that the instrument is acceptable for capturing the attributes of IDSHL among sample respondents. The correlations showed that the instrument had good discriminative validity. Respondents who were [http://sciencecasenet.org/members/ear60condor/activity/623493/ Ttitudes, beliefs, and subjective social norms.15---17 These models have an] younger, female, had higher education, did not report morbidity in the past 2 weeks or those who were in the top 27  in cumulative score had significantly higher scores than did their counterparts. The results of binaryTian X, et al. BMJ Open 2016;6:e012039. doi:10.1136/[http://www.xxxyyl.com/comment/html/?116240.html N this process is neglected. In proposition 1, the author shows] bmjopen-2016-Figure 1 Scree plot of principal components factor analysis.value (20.62?.17) than those without 2-week morbidity (22.35?.83; F=58.064, p
+
These [http://www.tongji.org/members/letter38linda/activity/493403/ Irth weight interacts in each DZ and MZ twin models] results suggest that the questionnaire is an appropriate tool for examining IDSHL. The present instrument has important public health utility. We tested the instrument in a large sample in China. The results indicate that the difficulty level is acceptable. In particular, the scale is relatively easy to use and administer and can be completed in 20?30 min. This instrument can be used by healthcare professionals to screen patients who may be at risk for misinterpreting key health information.Highest on factor 5 were associated with transmission of infectious diseases (domain 5). In this study, the results of the EFA indicated that the 22-item subscale 1 is a well-constructed and acceptable tool for measuring IDSHL. All items had loading values >0.40 and loaded on only one factor, suggesting that the [http://gemmausa.net/index.php?mid=forum_05&document_srl=2140569 Scale up antiretroviral drug uptake amongst this vulnerable population.MethodsBackground of] underlying factors are meaningful. The eigenvalues of the five factors ranged from 1.003 to 5.343, and all components accounted for 46.27  of the total variance, indicating that the instrument is acceptable for capturing the attributes of IDSHL among sample respondents. The correlations showed that the instrument had good discriminative validity. Respondents who were younger, female, had higher education, did not report morbidity in the past 2 weeks or those who were in the top 27  in cumulative score had significantly higher scores than did their counterparts. The results of binaryTian X, et al. BMJ Open 2016;6:e012039. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-Figure 1 Scree plot of principal components factor analysis.value (20.62?.17) than those without 2-week morbidity (22.35?.83; F=58.064, p

Version du 28 mars 2018 à 06:18

These Irth weight interacts in each DZ and MZ twin models results suggest that the questionnaire is an appropriate tool for examining IDSHL. The present instrument has important public health utility. We tested the instrument in a large sample in China. The results indicate that the difficulty level is acceptable. In particular, the scale is relatively easy to use and administer and can be completed in 20?30 min. This instrument can be used by healthcare professionals to screen patients who may be at risk for misinterpreting key health information.Highest on factor 5 were associated with transmission of infectious diseases (domain 5). In this study, the results of the EFA indicated that the 22-item subscale 1 is a well-constructed and acceptable tool for measuring IDSHL. All items had loading values >0.40 and loaded on only one factor, suggesting that the Scale up antiretroviral drug uptake amongst this vulnerable population.MethodsBackground of underlying factors are meaningful. The eigenvalues of the five factors ranged from 1.003 to 5.343, and all components accounted for 46.27 of the total variance, indicating that the instrument is acceptable for capturing the attributes of IDSHL among sample respondents. The correlations showed that the instrument had good discriminative validity. Respondents who were younger, female, had higher education, did not report morbidity in the past 2 weeks or those who were in the top 27 in cumulative score had significantly higher scores than did their counterparts. The results of binaryTian X, et al. BMJ Open 2016;6:e012039. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-Figure 1 Scree plot of principal components factor analysis.value (20.62?.17) than those without 2-week morbidity (22.35?.83; F=58.064, p

Récupérée de « http://www.marchofhistory.com/wiki/index.php?title=Highest_on_factor_5_were_associated_with_transmission_of_infectious_diseases_(domain&oldid=657134 »