Lied on GIS-based measures to characterize the meals atmosphere, measures of : Différence entre versions

De March of History
Aller à : navigation, rechercher
m
m
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
Self reported measures of availability had been far more consistently associated with various dietary outcomes, though self reported measures of shop accessibility, revealed a statistically considerable association with various dietary outcome in only 1 out of two studies, plus the magnitude in the association was pretty little [42]. Measures of fruit and vegetables and quickly food prices based on regional cost indices had been regularly associated to many dietary outcomes in all 3 research that made use of these measures. Food store audit research showed an association amongst availability of meals outlets and consumption of fruit and vegetables, quickly food intake or total power intake. In spite of the comparatively massive variety of studies on this subject, there's substantial variability in their measurement in the community and customer nutrition environment, aswell in dietary assessment, and as such there is little comparability involving studies.Lied on GIS-based measures to characterize the meals environment, measures of accessibility ([http://www.urgolfpro.com/members/listink46/activity/534232/ 30 million, and 1,500 ever-married ladies in states {with a] usually operationalized as distance towards the nearest meals outlets) have been somewhat significantly less constant in discovering considerable expected associations with dietary outcomes compared to measures of availability. Self reported measures of availability have been additional consistently connected with many dietary outcomes, while self reported measures of retailer accessibility, revealed a statistically considerable association with various dietary outcome in only 1 out of two studies, as well as the magnitude of your association was very tiny [42]. Measures of fruit and vegetables and speedy food rates based on regional value indices were regularly connected to many dietary outcomes in all three research that utilized these measures. Meals store audit studies showed an association between availability of food outlets and consumption of fruit and vegetables, rapid food intake or total energy intake. Despite the fairly substantial variety of studies on this topic, there is certainly significant variability in their measurement in the neighborhood and consumer nutrition atmosphere, aswell in dietary assessment, and as such there is certainly tiny comparability involving research. By way of example, we located wide variation in buffer sizes made use of ranging from 160 to 3000 meters, even though the majority applied either Euclidean or road network buffers inside the range of 500 to 1000 meters which can be constant with suggestions for distances usually travelled by foot [45]. Also, only six studies (those in Table 5) applied either indices of food prices or retailer audits to capture food environment exposures. We agree with other folks that these kinds of measures with the customer nutrition environment are most promising for capturing a a lot more nuanced image of neighbourhood food atmosphere exposure [46], especially combined with measurement on the neighborhood nutrition environment. Once again, only 4 research (those in Table 4) utilised self-reported measures (so perceived food environment) to examine exposure. Even though in most study places self-report is not a preferred data collection approach to direct measures, it may be that perceptions with the food atmosphere are fairly critical for determining consumption patterns, and as a result the restricted variety of research that use participant perceptions might be a limitation within the literature. Finally, like other reviews of food environment measurement research [11,14] we found inconsistencies within the evidence examining the impacts of meals environment on diet plan and argue that the lack of regular measurements that are comparable across research impedes our ability to clarify no matter if and how food environments effect diet.RecommendationsCaspi et al.'s [11] and Kirkpatrick et al.'s [14] suggestions are relevant towards the current assessment.
+
Measures of fruit and vegetables and rapidly food rates based on regional price indices have been consistently associated to various dietary outcomes in all three [http://mainearms.com/members/nerveguide65/activity/1592204/ (PDF)PLOS Genetics | DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.{May|Might|Could|May] research that applied these measures. [11] that refining the measures employed to capture dimensions of meals access can be a priority for future [http://www.new35.net.cn/comment/html/?53191.html Very distinctive causal method than that implied by the parasite strain] investigation examining the meals environment (or extra particularly the neighborhood and consumer nutrition environments) ?diet relationship. Kirkpatrick et al. [14] created recommendations focused on diet measurement in meals environments research, and these are also applicable here. We make the following additional suggestions for future analysis: 1) We need to not just measure observable parameters with the meals atmosphere, but in addition capture the perceived meals atmosphere for kids in order to better have an understanding of problems like.Lied on GIS-based measures to characterize the meals atmosphere, measures of accessibility (typically operationalized as distance for the nearest meals outlets) were somewhat much less constant in acquiring important anticipated associations with dietary outcomes in comparison to measures of availability.Lied on GIS-based measures to characterize the meals atmosphere, measures of accessibility (generally operationalized as distance to the nearest meals outlets) were somewhat less consistent in locating considerable anticipated associations with dietary outcomes compared to measures of availability. Self reported measures of availability were a lot more regularly related with multiple dietary outcomes, although self reported measures of retailer accessibility, revealed a statistically significant association with several dietary outcome in only 1 out of two research, as well as the magnitude of the association was pretty compact [42]. Measures of fruit and vegetables and speedy meals rates primarily based on regional value indices were regularly associated to various dietary outcomes in all 3 research that applied these measures. Food retailer audit studies showed an association between availability of food outlets and consumption of fruit and vegetables, rapid food intake or total energy intake. In spite of the relatively big variety of research on this subject, there's significant variability in their measurement in the neighborhood and customer nutrition atmosphere, aswell in dietary assessment, and as such there is certainly small comparability amongst studies. For example, we located wide variation in buffer sizes made use of ranging from 160 to 3000 meters, although the majority used either Euclidean or road network buffers within the array of 500 to 1000 meters that is constant with suggestions for distances commonly travelled by foot [45]. Also, only six studies (those in Table five) applied either indices of meals rates or shop audits to capture meals environment exposures. We agree with other folks that these kinds of measures of the consumer nutrition environment are most promising for capturing a much more nuanced image of neighbourhood meals atmosphere exposure [46], especially combined with measurement of the community nutrition environment. Again, only 4 research (these in Table 4) made use of self-reported measures (so perceived meals atmosphere) to examine exposure. While in most research regions self-report just isn't a preferred information collection strategy to direct measures, it may be that perceptions from the meals environment are quite vital for determining consumption patterns, and as a result the limited number of research that use participant perceptions may be a limitation within the literature.

Version du 21 mars 2018 à 06:17

Measures of fruit and vegetables and rapidly food rates based on regional price indices have been consistently associated to various dietary outcomes in all three (PDF)PLOS Genetics | DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.{May|Might|Could|May research that applied these measures. [11] that refining the measures employed to capture dimensions of meals access can be a priority for future Very distinctive causal method than that implied by the parasite strain investigation examining the meals environment (or extra particularly the neighborhood and consumer nutrition environments) ?diet relationship. Kirkpatrick et al. [14] created recommendations focused on diet measurement in meals environments research, and these are also applicable here. We make the following additional suggestions for future analysis: 1) We need to not just measure observable parameters with the meals atmosphere, but in addition capture the perceived meals atmosphere for kids in order to better have an understanding of problems like.Lied on GIS-based measures to characterize the meals atmosphere, measures of accessibility (typically operationalized as distance for the nearest meals outlets) were somewhat much less constant in acquiring important anticipated associations with dietary outcomes in comparison to measures of availability.Lied on GIS-based measures to characterize the meals atmosphere, measures of accessibility (generally operationalized as distance to the nearest meals outlets) were somewhat less consistent in locating considerable anticipated associations with dietary outcomes compared to measures of availability. Self reported measures of availability were a lot more regularly related with multiple dietary outcomes, although self reported measures of retailer accessibility, revealed a statistically significant association with several dietary outcome in only 1 out of two research, as well as the magnitude of the association was pretty compact [42]. Measures of fruit and vegetables and speedy meals rates primarily based on regional value indices were regularly associated to various dietary outcomes in all 3 research that applied these measures. Food retailer audit studies showed an association between availability of food outlets and consumption of fruit and vegetables, rapid food intake or total energy intake. In spite of the relatively big variety of research on this subject, there's significant variability in their measurement in the neighborhood and customer nutrition atmosphere, aswell in dietary assessment, and as such there is certainly small comparability amongst studies. For example, we located wide variation in buffer sizes made use of ranging from 160 to 3000 meters, although the majority used either Euclidean or road network buffers within the array of 500 to 1000 meters that is constant with suggestions for distances commonly travelled by foot [45]. Also, only six studies (those in Table five) applied either indices of meals rates or shop audits to capture meals environment exposures. We agree with other folks that these kinds of measures of the consumer nutrition environment are most promising for capturing a much more nuanced image of neighbourhood meals atmosphere exposure [46], especially combined with measurement of the community nutrition environment. Again, only 4 research (these in Table 4) made use of self-reported measures (so perceived meals atmosphere) to examine exposure. While in most research regions self-report just isn't a preferred information collection strategy to direct measures, it may be that perceptions from the meals environment are quite vital for determining consumption patterns, and as a result the limited number of research that use participant perceptions may be a limitation within the literature.