Gnificant association between geographic availability and dietary outcomes, while the other : Différence entre versions

De March of History
Aller à : navigation, rechercher
m
m
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
Three of the eleven studies showed some [http://www.tongji.org/members/kickrisk69/activity/489784/ Lls. Inside the course of tumor {growth] associations but not always in a consistent direction [27,31,37]. Relative to NBHs with poorest access to shops, children with best access to shops consumed more FV (IR = 1.08, 95  CI 1.01-1.15), less dietary fat (IR = 0.51, 95  CI 0.33-0.78) and had a higher Diet Quality Index (DQI) (IR = 2.26, 95  CI 1.09-4.69). - Perceived availability of FF outlets and convenience stores positively associated with moderate/high consumptions of FF (ORff: 1.10; ORcon = 1.15) and junk food/ soft drinks (ORff = 1.10; ORcon = 1.10). - Significant negative association between the perceived availability of restaurants with intakes of FV (ORveg = 0.87 and ORfruit = 0.83). - Positive relationship between reporting FF outlets with intake of junk food/soft drinks.Gnificant association between geographic availability and dietary outcomes, while the other 4 studies revealed only null associations [18,19,34,38]. Three of the eleven studies showed some associations but not always in a consistent direction [27,31,37]. For example Laska et al. [31] reported that SSB consumption was positively associated with food outlet density across a wide range of measures, including having at least one FF restaurant, a restaurant of any kind, a convenience store and grocery store or any retail facility within a 1600m residential network buffer, and the presence of a restaurant within 800m. Measures representing food accessibility demonstrated some inconsistent relationships with dietary outcomes. Among the 14 of 16 studies that examined distance to afood store in relation to diet, three revealed null associations [18,34,41]. Five of the remaining eleven studies showed associations but not always in a consistent direction [23,27,37,38,40]. For instance, Timperio et. al. [40] found that the likelihood of consuming vegetables > = 3 times/day was greater not only the farther children lived from a supermarket (OR = 1.27, 95  CI 1.07-1.51) and but also the farther children lived from FF outlet (OR = 1.19, 95  CI 1.06-1.35). Skidmore et al. [37] reported not only that living further away from a supermarket increased portions of fruit (0.11 portions/week/km increase, p
+
[31] reported that SSB consumption was positively associated with food outlet density across a wide range of measures, including having at least one FF restaurant, a [http://theunitypoint.org/members/pizza5angle/activity/3074768/ Rom the food provide. Sources of preformed vitamin D] restaurant of any kind, a convenience store and grocery store or any retail facility within a 1600m residential network buffer, and the presence of a restaurant within 800m. Table 4 examines the 4 studies that used participant reported measures to characterize the community FE. Studies that used measures of perceived food availability [26,43] were particularly consistent in showing a relationship with dietary outcomes (2/2 studies). For example, Ho et al. [26] reported that perceived availability of FF outlets and convenience stores was positively associated with moderate/high consumptions of FF (ORff: 1.10; ORcon = 1.15) and junk food/soft drinks (ORff = 1.10; ORcon = 1.10). They also observed a significant negative association between the perceived availability of a restaurant with intakes of FV (ORveg = 0.87 and ORfruit = 0.83). Selfreported proximity of NBH food outlets was found to beTable 4 The association between food environment and dietary intake in studies using self-reported measures to capture food environment exposureAuthor (Year) Ding et al. [21] Sample size (n) 458 Specific exposure reported Self-report proximity of NBH food outlets (healthful food outlets vs. less healthful food outlets) Access to food stores from home (self  eported) FF outcome Daily FV intake Results FV intake was not significantly associated with community food environment. Relative to NBHs with poorest access to shops, children with best access to shops consumed more FV (IR = 1.08, 95  CI 1.01-1.15), less dietary fat (IR = 0.51, 95  CI 0.33-0.78) and had a higher Diet Quality Index (DQI) (IR = 2.26, 95  CI 1.09-4.69). - Perceived availability of FF outlets and convenience stores positively associated with moderate/high consumptions of FF (ORff: 1.10; ORcon = 1.15) and junk food/ soft drinks (ORff = 1.10; ORcon = 1.10).Gnificant association between geographic availability and dietary outcomes, while the other 4 studies revealed only null associations [18,19,34,38]. Three of the eleven studies showed some associations but not always in a consistent direction [27,31,37]. For example Laska et al. [31] reported that SSB consumption was positively associated with food outlet density across a wide range of measures, including having at least one FF restaurant, a restaurant of any kind, a convenience store and grocery store or any retail facility within a 1600m residential network buffer, and the presence of a restaurant within 800m. Measures representing food accessibility demonstrated some inconsistent relationships with dietary outcomes. Among the 14 of 16 studies that examined distance to afood store in relation to diet, three revealed null associations [18,34,41]. Five of the remaining eleven studies showed associations but not always in a consistent direction [23,27,37,38,40]. For instance, Timperio et. al. [40] found that the likelihood of consuming vegetables > = 3 times/day was greater not only the farther children lived from a supermarket (OR = 1.27, 95  CI 1.07-1.51) and but also the farther children lived from FF outlet (OR = 1.19, 95  CI 1.06-1.35). Skidmore et al. [37] reported not only that living further away from a supermarket increased portions of fruit (0.11 portions/week/km increase, p

Version du 7 mars 2018 à 09:14

[31] reported that SSB consumption was positively associated with food outlet density across a wide range of measures, including having at least one FF restaurant, a Rom the food provide. Sources of preformed vitamin D restaurant of any kind, a convenience store and grocery store or any retail facility within a 1600m residential network buffer, and the presence of a restaurant within 800m. Table 4 examines the 4 studies that used participant reported measures to characterize the community FE. Studies that used measures of perceived food availability [26,43] were particularly consistent in showing a relationship with dietary outcomes (2/2 studies). For example, Ho et al. [26] reported that perceived availability of FF outlets and convenience stores was positively associated with moderate/high consumptions of FF (ORff: 1.10; ORcon = 1.15) and junk food/soft drinks (ORff = 1.10; ORcon = 1.10). They also observed a significant negative association between the perceived availability of a restaurant with intakes of FV (ORveg = 0.87 and ORfruit = 0.83). Selfreported proximity of NBH food outlets was found to beTable 4 The association between food environment and dietary intake in studies using self-reported measures to capture food environment exposureAuthor (Year) Ding et al. [21] Sample size (n) 458 Specific exposure reported Self-report proximity of NBH food outlets (healthful food outlets vs. less healthful food outlets) Access to food stores from home (self eported) FF outcome Daily FV intake Results FV intake was not significantly associated with community food environment. Relative to NBHs with poorest access to shops, children with best access to shops consumed more FV (IR = 1.08, 95 CI 1.01-1.15), less dietary fat (IR = 0.51, 95 CI 0.33-0.78) and had a higher Diet Quality Index (DQI) (IR = 2.26, 95 CI 1.09-4.69). - Perceived availability of FF outlets and convenience stores positively associated with moderate/high consumptions of FF (ORff: 1.10; ORcon = 1.15) and junk food/ soft drinks (ORff = 1.10; ORcon = 1.10).Gnificant association between geographic availability and dietary outcomes, while the other 4 studies revealed only null associations [18,19,34,38]. Three of the eleven studies showed some associations but not always in a consistent direction [27,31,37]. For example Laska et al. [31] reported that SSB consumption was positively associated with food outlet density across a wide range of measures, including having at least one FF restaurant, a restaurant of any kind, a convenience store and grocery store or any retail facility within a 1600m residential network buffer, and the presence of a restaurant within 800m. Measures representing food accessibility demonstrated some inconsistent relationships with dietary outcomes. Among the 14 of 16 studies that examined distance to afood store in relation to diet, three revealed null associations [18,34,41]. Five of the remaining eleven studies showed associations but not always in a consistent direction [23,27,37,38,40]. For instance, Timperio et. al. [40] found that the likelihood of consuming vegetables > = 3 times/day was greater not only the farther children lived from a supermarket (OR = 1.27, 95 CI 1.07-1.51) and but also the farther children lived from FF outlet (OR = 1.19, 95 CI 1.06-1.35). Skidmore et al. [37] reported not only that living further away from a supermarket increased portions of fruit (0.11 portions/week/km increase, p