Gnificant association between geographic availability and dietary outcomes, while the other : Différence entre versions
(Page créée avec « Among the 14 of 16 studies that examined distance to afood store in relation to diet, three revealed null associations [18,34,41]. Five of the remaining eleven studies sho... ») |
m |
||
| Ligne 1 : | Ligne 1 : | ||
| − | Among the 14 of 16 studies that examined distance to afood store in relation to diet, three revealed null associations [18,34,41]. Five of the remaining eleven studies showed associations but not always in a consistent direction [23,27,37,38,40]. For instance, Timperio et. al. [40] found that the likelihood of consuming vegetables > = 3 times/day was greater not only the farther children lived from a supermarket (OR = 1.27, 95 CI 1.07-1.51) and but also the farther children lived from FF outlet (OR = 1.19, 95 CI 1.06-1.35). | + | Three of the eleven studies showed some [http://www.tongji.org/members/kickrisk69/activity/489784/ Lls. Inside the course of tumor {growth] associations but not always in a consistent direction [27,31,37]. Relative to NBHs with poorest access to shops, children with best access to shops consumed more FV (IR = 1.08, 95 CI 1.01-1.15), less dietary fat (IR = 0.51, 95 CI 0.33-0.78) and had a higher Diet Quality Index (DQI) (IR = 2.26, 95 CI 1.09-4.69). - Perceived availability of FF outlets and convenience stores positively associated with moderate/high consumptions of FF (ORff: 1.10; ORcon = 1.15) and junk food/ soft drinks (ORff = 1.10; ORcon = 1.10). - Significant negative association between the perceived availability of restaurants with intakes of FV (ORveg = 0.87 and ORfruit = 0.83). - Positive relationship between reporting FF outlets with intake of junk food/soft drinks.Gnificant association between geographic availability and dietary outcomes, while the other 4 studies revealed only null associations [18,19,34,38]. Three of the eleven studies showed some associations but not always in a consistent direction [27,31,37]. For example Laska et al. [31] reported that SSB consumption was positively associated with food outlet density across a wide range of measures, including having at least one FF restaurant, a restaurant of any kind, a convenience store and grocery store or any retail facility within a 1600m residential network buffer, and the presence of a restaurant within 800m. Measures representing food accessibility demonstrated some inconsistent relationships with dietary outcomes. Among the 14 of 16 studies that examined distance to afood store in relation to diet, three revealed null associations [18,34,41]. Five of the remaining eleven studies showed associations but not always in a consistent direction [23,27,37,38,40]. For instance, Timperio et. al. [40] found that the likelihood of consuming vegetables > = 3 times/day was greater not only the farther children lived from a supermarket (OR = 1.27, 95 CI 1.07-1.51) and but also the farther children lived from FF outlet (OR = 1.19, 95 CI 1.06-1.35). Skidmore et al. [37] reported not only that living further away from a supermarket increased portions of fruit (0.11 portions/week/km increase, p |
Version du 5 mars 2018 à 07:32
Three of the eleven studies showed some Lls. Inside the course of tumor {growth associations but not always in a consistent direction [27,31,37]. Relative to NBHs with poorest access to shops, children with best access to shops consumed more FV (IR = 1.08, 95 CI 1.01-1.15), less dietary fat (IR = 0.51, 95 CI 0.33-0.78) and had a higher Diet Quality Index (DQI) (IR = 2.26, 95 CI 1.09-4.69). - Perceived availability of FF outlets and convenience stores positively associated with moderate/high consumptions of FF (ORff: 1.10; ORcon = 1.15) and junk food/ soft drinks (ORff = 1.10; ORcon = 1.10). - Significant negative association between the perceived availability of restaurants with intakes of FV (ORveg = 0.87 and ORfruit = 0.83). - Positive relationship between reporting FF outlets with intake of junk food/soft drinks.Gnificant association between geographic availability and dietary outcomes, while the other 4 studies revealed only null associations [18,19,34,38]. Three of the eleven studies showed some associations but not always in a consistent direction [27,31,37]. For example Laska et al. [31] reported that SSB consumption was positively associated with food outlet density across a wide range of measures, including having at least one FF restaurant, a restaurant of any kind, a convenience store and grocery store or any retail facility within a 1600m residential network buffer, and the presence of a restaurant within 800m. Measures representing food accessibility demonstrated some inconsistent relationships with dietary outcomes. Among the 14 of 16 studies that examined distance to afood store in relation to diet, three revealed null associations [18,34,41]. Five of the remaining eleven studies showed associations but not always in a consistent direction [23,27,37,38,40]. For instance, Timperio et. al. [40] found that the likelihood of consuming vegetables > = 3 times/day was greater not only the farther children lived from a supermarket (OR = 1.27, 95 CI 1.07-1.51) and but also the farther children lived from FF outlet (OR = 1.19, 95 CI 1.06-1.35). Skidmore et al. [37] reported not only that living further away from a supermarket increased portions of fruit (0.11 portions/week/km increase, p
