Lied on GIS-based measures to characterize the food environment, measures of : Différence entre versions

De March of History
Aller à : navigation, rechercher
(Page créée avec « [14] created recommendations focused on diet program measurement in meals environments analysis, and they are also applicable here. We make the following extra suggestions... »)
 
m
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
−
[14] created recommendations focused on diet program measurement in meals environments analysis, and they are also applicable here. We make the following extra suggestions for future investigation: 1) We want to not merely measure observable parameters of your food atmosphere, but additionally capture the perceived food environment for kids in an effort to much better realize concerns for instance.Lied on GIS-based measures to characterize the meals environment, measures of accessibility (typically operationalized as distance towards the nearest meals outlets) had been somewhat less constant in obtaining substantial anticipated associations with dietary outcomes in comparison with measures of availability. Self reported measures of availability had been additional regularly connected with a number of dietary outcomes, whilst self reported measures of store accessibility, revealed a statistically important association with multiple dietary outcome in only 1 out of two studies, plus the magnitude from the association was incredibly little [42]. Measures of fruit and vegetables and rapidly meals costs primarily based on regional cost indices have been regularly related to various dietary outcomes in all three studies that used these measures. Food shop audit research showed an association between availability of food outlets and consumption of fruit and vegetables, quick meals intake or total energy intake. In spite of the fairly significant variety of studies on this subject, there is important variability in their measurement with the neighborhood and customer nutrition atmosphere, aswell in dietary assessment, and as such there's small comparability amongst studies. By way of example, we discovered wide variation in buffer sizes applied ranging from 160 to 3000 meters, while the majority made use of either Euclidean or road network buffers inside the range of 500 to 1000 meters which can be consistent with recommendations for distances ordinarily travelled by foot [45]. Also, only six studies (these in Table five) used either indices of food rates or retailer audits to capture meals environment exposures. We agree with other folks that these types of measures on the customer nutrition environment are most promising for capturing a additional nuanced image of neighbourhood meals environment exposure [46], in particular combined with measurement of your neighborhood nutrition environment. Again, only four research (those in Table 4) employed self-reported measures (so perceived meals atmosphere) to examine exposure. Though in most study locations self-report just isn't a preferred information collection [http://lifelearninginstitute.net/members/taxi6tailor/activity/709887/ S to their very own inadequacies (e.g., language] system to direct measures, it may be that perceptions on the meals environment are rather critical for determining consumption patterns, and hence the limited number of studies that use participant perceptions might be a limitation inside the literature. Ultimately, like other testimonials of meals atmosphere measurement research [11,14] we found inconsistencies in the evidence examining the impacts of food atmosphere on diet regime and argue that the lack of common measurements which are comparable across studies impedes our ability to clarify regardless of whether and how meals environments effect diet plan.RecommendationsCaspi et al.'s [11] and Kirkpatrick et al.'s [14] suggestions are relevant for the current critique. We agree with all the previous systematic overview by Caspi et al. [11] that refining the measures utilised to capture dimensions of food access is often a priority for future research examining the meals atmosphere (or a lot more especially the community and consumer nutrition environments) ?diet program partnership.
+
For example, we located wide variation in buffer sizes used ranging from 160 to 3000 meters, even though the majority used either Euclidean or road network buffers within the array of 500 to 1000 meters which can be consistent with recommendations for [http://www.replicascamisetasfutbol2014.com/comment/html/?127504.html Ise of self-disconnection in an try to handle limited household budgets.] distances usually travelled by foot [45]. [14] produced recommendations focused on diet regime measurement in food environments study, and these are also applicable here. We make the following extra recommendations for future study: 1) We need to have to not just measure observable parameters from the food atmosphere, but also capture the perceived meals atmosphere for children so that you can much better have an understanding of challenges including.Lied on GIS-based measures to characterize the meals atmosphere, measures of accessibility (normally operationalized as distance to the nearest meals outlets) were somewhat less consistent in locating considerable anticipated associations with dietary outcomes compared to measures of availability. Self reported measures of availability were a lot more regularly connected with multiple dietary outcomes, although self reported measures of retailer accessibility, revealed a statistically significant association with a number of dietary outcome in only 1 out of two studies, and also the magnitude with the association was pretty compact [42]. Measures of fruit and vegetables and speedy food rates primarily based on regional price tag indices had been regularly associated to various dietary outcomes in all 3 studies that made use of these measures. Food shop audit research showed an association between availability of meals outlets and consumption of fruit and vegetables, speedy food intake or total power intake. In spite of the relatively huge variety of studies on this subject, there's significant variability in their measurement in the community and consumer nutrition atmosphere, aswell in dietary assessment, and as such there is certainly tiny comparability amongst studies. One example is, we found wide variation in buffer sizes made use of ranging from 160 to 3000 meters, even though the majority utilized either Euclidean or road network buffers within the range of 500 to 1000 meters that is consistent with recommendations for distances generally travelled by foot [45]. Also, only six studies (these in Table 5) employed either indices of meals rates or shop audits to capture food environment exposures. We agree with other people that these kinds of measures with the customer nutrition environment are most promising for capturing a much more nuanced picture of neighbourhood food environment exposure [46], in particular combined with measurement of your community nutrition atmosphere. Once again, only 4 studies (those in Table 4) utilized self-reported measures (so perceived meals atmosphere) to examine exposure. When in most analysis areas self-report isn't a preferred information collection method to direct measures, it may be that perceptions on the food environment are really vital for figuring out consumption patterns, and as a result the restricted variety of studies that use participant perceptions may be a limitation within the literature. Ultimately, like other reviews of meals environment measurement studies [11,14] we found inconsistencies within the evidence examining the impacts of meals environment on diet program and argue that the lack of common measurements which might be comparable across research impedes our ability to clarify regardless of whether and how meals environments impact eating plan.RecommendationsCaspi et al.'s [11] and Kirkpatrick et al.'s [14] recommendations are relevant to the existing overview.

Version du 28 février 2018 à 17:46

For example, we located wide variation in buffer sizes used ranging from 160 to 3000 meters, even though the majority used either Euclidean or road network buffers within the array of 500 to 1000 meters which can be consistent with recommendations for Ise of self-disconnection in an try to handle limited household budgets. distances usually travelled by foot [45]. [14] produced recommendations focused on diet regime measurement in food environments study, and these are also applicable here. We make the following extra recommendations for future study: 1) We need to have to not just measure observable parameters from the food atmosphere, but also capture the perceived meals atmosphere for children so that you can much better have an understanding of challenges including.Lied on GIS-based measures to characterize the meals atmosphere, measures of accessibility (normally operationalized as distance to the nearest meals outlets) were somewhat less consistent in locating considerable anticipated associations with dietary outcomes compared to measures of availability. Self reported measures of availability were a lot more regularly connected with multiple dietary outcomes, although self reported measures of retailer accessibility, revealed a statistically significant association with a number of dietary outcome in only 1 out of two studies, and also the magnitude with the association was pretty compact [42]. Measures of fruit and vegetables and speedy food rates primarily based on regional price tag indices had been regularly associated to various dietary outcomes in all 3 studies that made use of these measures. Food shop audit research showed an association between availability of meals outlets and consumption of fruit and vegetables, speedy food intake or total power intake. In spite of the relatively huge variety of studies on this subject, there's significant variability in their measurement in the community and consumer nutrition atmosphere, aswell in dietary assessment, and as such there is certainly tiny comparability amongst studies. One example is, we found wide variation in buffer sizes made use of ranging from 160 to 3000 meters, even though the majority utilized either Euclidean or road network buffers within the range of 500 to 1000 meters that is consistent with recommendations for distances generally travelled by foot [45]. Also, only six studies (these in Table 5) employed either indices of meals rates or shop audits to capture food environment exposures. We agree with other people that these kinds of measures with the customer nutrition environment are most promising for capturing a much more nuanced picture of neighbourhood food environment exposure [46], in particular combined with measurement of your community nutrition atmosphere. Once again, only 4 studies (those in Table 4) utilized self-reported measures (so perceived meals atmosphere) to examine exposure. When in most analysis areas self-report isn't a preferred information collection method to direct measures, it may be that perceptions on the food environment are really vital for figuring out consumption patterns, and as a result the restricted variety of studies that use participant perceptions may be a limitation within the literature. Ultimately, like other reviews of meals environment measurement studies [11,14] we found inconsistencies within the evidence examining the impacts of meals environment on diet program and argue that the lack of common measurements which might be comparable across research impedes our ability to clarify regardless of whether and how meals environments impact eating plan.RecommendationsCaspi et al.'s [11] and Kirkpatrick et al.'s [14] recommendations are relevant to the existing overview.

Récupérée de « http://www.marchofhistory.com/wiki/index.php?title=Lied_on_GIS-based_measures_to_characterize_the_food_environment,_measures_of&oldid=603446 »