Utilisateur:ChanceHgn2977 : Différence entre versions

De March of History
Aller à : navigation, rechercher
m
m
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
−
The Focus Of Scientific Learning<br><br>Most of the cycles found in the scientific study were classified as focusing on making forecasts, interpreting graphs, and other epistemic variables, with just a couple of cycles detected across the three teachers that focused on conceptual development. The study found that while students' performance varied across questions and teachers, the highest degree of pupil performance was noticed in the class of the teacher with the most whole questioning cycles. However, the study also raises the question of whether the functionality differences observed between classes were attributable to on the fly formative assessment practices alone or were a manifestation of overall differences in teachers regular science teaching skills.<br><br>Duschl and Gitomer (1997) conducted research on planned appraisal dialogs in the Science Education through Portfolio Instruction and Appraisal (SEPIA) project. These conversations are accustomed to help teachers provide scaffolding and support for students' construction of meaning by carefully choosing learning experiences, activities, questions, and other elements of teaching (Duschl and Gitomer, 1997). Job SEPIA uses modeling and explicit teaching to help students "learn the way to learn in science" (p. 41). Duschl and Gitomer investigated how two middle school teachers worked with Endeavor SEPIA's model of instruction. Developing a portfolio as they complete the unit, students are presented with real difficulties and proceed through an established sequence of investigations to develop their conceptual understanding, reasoning strategies related to ways of knowing in science, and communicating abilities.<br><br>A fundamental component of the evaluation dialog is a three-part procedure that involves the teacher receiving student thoughts through writing, drawing, and sharing orally, in order that students can show the teacher and other students what they know. The second measure entails the teacher acknowledging pupils' thoughts through public discussion, and the third has the teacher using notions to achieve a consensus in the classroom by asking pupils to reason on the basis of signs. Endeavor SEPIA also provides teachers with standards for directing pupils during these dialogs, including a focus on relationships, clarity, and consistency with evidence, use of examples, making sense, recognizing alternative explanations, and correctness. Participating students in assessment-related dialogues about their work provides a context in which standards and criteria of quality are negotiated and discussed openly (Duschl and Gitomer, 1997). The authors reasoned that teachers should focus less on tasks and activities and more on the reasoning processes and fundamental conceptual constructions of science.<br><br>Mfinstrell and vanZee (2003) describe questioning as a form of planned for formative evaluation by using questions both to diagnose the state of pupils thinking and to prescribe an appropriate next step about them to take in their own learning. VanZee and Minstrell's (1997) study investigated how the "brooding toss" strategy Minstrell used in his high school physics classroom gave students responsibility for tracking their own thinking and making their meanings clear. A reflective throw is understood to be a question that "catches" perish meaning of a student's statement and then "throws" duty for thinking back to the pupil. By way of example, if your student made a specific declaration, the teacher would reply with another question, such as "Now what can you mean by." or "If you were to do? what would you are doing?" (p. 245). In this way, the teacher (in this case, Minstrell) used questions to find out what students were thinking, to contemplate with his pupils how their thinking matches with what physicists believe, and to place responsibility for thinking back on the students. While the study occurred in the high school classroom of only one teacher, it raises the important point for all amounts of science education that a straightforward, planned-for questioning strategy can be an efficient tool for formative evaluation. The brooding throw driven pupils to take possession of the thoughts and to think about them further, and it also allowed the teacher to respond and take actions on pupils' notions as they were offered to the class.
+
Make Your Website More Panda Friendly<br>The recent Google Panda upgrade has raised the bar not only for Search Engine Optimization experts but also for web designers. It’s getting rougher and tougher to rank well and that means which you actually need to pay attention to all design and Google ranking variables. When we do this, search engines rewards us because we're rewarding our audience and supplying them with the information and experience they're seeking. These points can help you to make your web site panda proof:-<br>1.Content is key:The Panda algorithm upgrade accentuates providing confidence only on websites that contain unique and useful content. This will help users better find content relevant to their hunt. If you supply web site content that is unique, important, high quality and preferably 1000 words, your website will likely be rewarded with improved positions and thus, increased traffic.<br>6.Webmaster tools: It enables webmasters to get a better notion of what Google "presumes" about their web sites, by what means the Google "spider" sees them, and what improvements could be made.<br>7.Social media evidence: Google Panda takes social media tendencies seriously and content that's loved by social media websites like Twitter and Facebook gets better position in search engines.<br>2.Above the fold design: Narrowing your header pictures, removing header banner ad pictures and pushing more content onto the top of your website will help with Panda.<br>3.Web Page indexing: A website with more than 100 web pages and maximum pages indexed by Google would be regarded as a Panda favorable web site.<br>4.Page rank: Page ranking is still among the most important variables. PageRank is an unaffiliated measure of Google’s perception of the quality/ability/credibility of an individual web page. It doesn't depend on any particular search phrase. Google conveniently reports this as a number from 0-10 (10 being the greatest).<br>5.Check your Domain registration: Domain registration for five years helps to improve power points. This is a small tip, but every little bit helps.<br>8.Optimize for Rapid Load Times: Avoid flash, single background pictures in the website. Google tends to favor websites which are snappy, quick, and rapid.

Version du 12 octobre 2017 à 03:16

Make Your Website More Panda Friendly
The recent Google Panda upgrade has raised the bar not only for Search Engine Optimization experts but also for web designers. It’s getting rougher and tougher to rank well and that means which you actually need to pay attention to all design and Google ranking variables. When we do this, search engines rewards us because we're rewarding our audience and supplying them with the information and experience they're seeking. These points can help you to make your web site panda proof:-
1.Content is key:The Panda algorithm upgrade accentuates providing confidence only on websites that contain unique and useful content. This will help users better find content relevant to their hunt. If you supply web site content that is unique, important, high quality and preferably 1000 words, your website will likely be rewarded with improved positions and thus, increased traffic.
6.Webmaster tools: It enables webmasters to get a better notion of what Google "presumes" about their web sites, by what means the Google "spider" sees them, and what improvements could be made.
7.Social media evidence: Google Panda takes social media tendencies seriously and content that's loved by social media websites like Twitter and Facebook gets better position in search engines.
2.Above the fold design: Narrowing your header pictures, removing header banner ad pictures and pushing more content onto the top of your website will help with Panda.
3.Web Page indexing: A website with more than 100 web pages and maximum pages indexed by Google would be regarded as a Panda favorable web site.
4.Page rank: Page ranking is still among the most important variables. PageRank is an unaffiliated measure of Google’s perception of the quality/ability/credibility of an individual web page. It doesn't depend on any particular search phrase. Google conveniently reports this as a number from 0-10 (10 being the greatest).
5.Check your Domain registration: Domain registration for five years helps to improve power points. This is a small tip, but every little bit helps.
8.Optimize for Rapid Load Times: Avoid flash, single background pictures in the website. Google tends to favor websites which are snappy, quick, and rapid.

Récupérée de « http://www.marchofhistory.com/wiki/index.php?title=Utilisateur:ChanceHgn2977&oldid=241530 »