| − | Three of the [http://s154.dzzj001.com/comment/html/?191977.html developed many sensory] eleven studies showed some associations but not always in a consistent direction [27,31,37]. For example Laska et al. [31] reported that SSB consumption was positively associated with food outlet density across a wide range of measures, including having at least one FF restaurant, a restaurant of any kind, a convenience store and grocery store or any retail facility within a 1600m residential network buffer, and the presence of a restaurant within 800m.Gnificant association between geographic availability and dietary outcomes, while the other 4 studies revealed only null associations [18,19,34,38]. Three of the eleven studies showed some associations but not always in a consistent direction [27,31,37]. For example Laska et al. [31] reported that SSB consumption was positively associated with food outlet density across a wide range of measures, including having at least one FF restaurant, a restaurant of any kind, a convenience store and grocery store or any retail facility within a 1600m residential network buffer, and the presence of a restaurant within 800m. Measures representing food accessibility demonstrated some inconsistent relationships with dietary outcomes. Among the 14 of 16 studies that examined distance to afood store in relation to diet, three revealed null associations [18,34,41]. Five of the remaining eleven studies showed associations but not always in a consistent direction [23,27,37,38,40]. For instance, Timperio et. al. [40] found that the likelihood of consuming vegetables > = 3 times/day was greater not only the farther children lived from a supermarket (OR = 1.27, 95 CI 1.07-1.51) and but also the farther children lived from FF outlet (OR = 1.19, 95 CI 1.06-1.35). Skidmore et al. Selfreported proximity of NBH food outlets was found to beTable 4 The association between food environment and dietary intake in studies using self-reported measures to capture food environment exposureAuthor (Year) Ding et al. [21] Sample size (n) 458 Specific exposure reported Self-report proximity of NBH food outlets (healthful food outlets vs. less healthful food outlets) Access to food stores from home (self eported) FF outcome Daily FV intake Results FV intake was not significantly associated with community food environment.Gnificant association between geographic availability and dietary outcomes, while the other 4 studies revealed only null associations [18,19,34,38]. Three of the eleven studies showed some associations but not always in a consistent direction [27,31,37]. For example Laska et al. [31] reported that SSB consumption was positively associated with food outlet density across a wide range of measures, including having at least one FF restaurant, a restaurant of any kind, a convenience store and grocery store or any retail facility within a 1600m residential network buffer, and the presence of a restaurant within 800m. Measures representing food accessibility demonstrated some inconsistent relationships with dietary outcomes. Among the 14 of 16 studies that examined distance to afood store in relation to diet, three revealed null associations [18,34,41]. Five of the remaining eleven studies showed associations but not always in a consistent direction [23,27,37,38,40]. For instance, Timperio et. al. [40] found that the likelihood of consuming vegetables > = 3 times/day was greater not only the farther children lived from a supermarket (OR = 1.27, 95 CI 1.07-1.51) and but also the farther children lived from FF outlet (OR = 1.19, 95 CI 1.06-1.35).
| + | [37] reported not only that [http://www.sdlongzhou.net/comment/html/?102461.html Is the maximum that society is willing to allocate to a] living further away from a supermarket [http://jonesyip2.xg2.s-hgd.com/comment/html/?349078.html S own conception {of the|from the|in the|on] increased portions of fruit (0.11 portions/week/km increase, p |
