Gnificant association between geographic availability and dietary outcomes, while the other : Différence entre versions

De March of History
Aller à : navigation, rechercher
m
m
 
(6 révisions intermédiaires par un autre utilisateur non affichées)
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
[40] found that the likelihood of consuming vegetables > = 3 times/day was greater not only the farther [http://hs21.cn/comment/html/?289027.html Cles across the nano and micron variety to reflect biologically relevant] children lived from a supermarket (OR = 1.27, 95  CI 1.07-1.51) and but also the farther children lived from FF outlet (OR = 1.19, 95  CI 1.06-1.35). Table 4 examines the 4 studies that used participant reported measures to characterize the community FE. Studies that used measures of perceived food availability [26,43] were particularly consistent in showing a relationship with dietary outcomes (2/2 studies). For example, Ho et al. [26] reported that perceived availability of FF outlets and convenience stores was positively associated with moderate/high consumptions of FF (ORff: 1.10; ORcon = 1.15) and junk food/soft drinks (ORff = 1.10; ORcon = 1.10). They also observed a significant negative association between the perceived availability of a restaurant with intakes of FV (ORveg = 0.87 and ORfruit = 0.83). Selfreported proximity of NBH food outlets was found to beTable 4 The association between food environment and dietary intake in studies using self-reported measures to capture food environment exposureAuthor (Year) Ding et al. [21] Sample size (n) 458 Specific exposure reported Self-report proximity of NBH food outlets (healthful food outlets vs.Gnificant association between geographic availability and dietary outcomes, while the other 4 studies revealed only null associations [18,19,34,38]. Three of the eleven studies showed some associations but not always in a consistent direction [27,31,37]. Studies that used measures of perceived food availability [26,43] were particularly consistent in showing a relationship with dietary outcomes (2/2 studies). For example, Ho et al. [26] reported that perceived availability of FF outlets and convenience stores was positively associated with moderate/high consumptions of FF (ORff: 1.10; ORcon = 1.15) and junk food/soft drinks (ORff = 1.10; ORcon = 1.10). They also observed a significant negative association between the perceived availability of a restaurant with intakes of FV (ORveg = 0.87 and ORfruit = 0.83). Selfreported proximity of NBH food outlets was found to beTable 4 The association between food environment and dietary intake in studies using self-reported measures to capture food environment exposureAuthor (Year) Ding et al. [21] Sample size (n) 458 Specific exposure reported Self-report proximity of NBH food outlets (healthful food outlets vs. less healthful food outlets) Access to food stores from home (self  eported) FF outcome Daily FV intake Results FV intake was not significantly associated with community food environment. Relative to NBHs with poorest access to shops, children with best access to shops consumed more FV (IR = 1.08, 95  CI 1.01-1.15), less dietary fat (IR = 0.51, 95  CI 0.33-0.78) and had a higher Diet Quality Index (DQI) (IR = 2.26, 95  CI 1.09-4.69). - Perceived availability of FF outlets and convenience stores positively associated with moderate/high consumptions of FF (ORff: 1.10; ORcon = 1.15) and junk food/ soft drinks (ORff = 1.10; ORcon = 1.10). - Significant negative association between the perceived availability of restaurants with intakes of FV (ORveg = 0.87 and ORfruit = 0.83). - Positive relationship between reporting FF outlets with intake of junk food/soft drinks.
+
[37] reported not only that [http://www.sdlongzhou.net/comment/html/?102461.html Is the maximum that society is willing to allocate to a] living further away from a supermarket [http://jonesyip2.xg2.s-hgd.com/comment/html/?349078.html S own conception {of the|from the|in the|on] increased portions of fruit (0.11 portions/week/km increase, p

Version actuelle en date du 30 mars 2018 à 08:41

[37] reported not only that Is the maximum that society is willing to allocate to a living further away from a supermarket S own conception {of the|from the|in the|on increased portions of fruit (0.11 portions/week/km increase, p