Gnificant association between geographic availability and dietary outcomes, while the other : Différence entre versions

For example Laska et al. [31] reported that SSB consumption was positively associated with food outlet density across a wide range of measures, including having at least one FF restaurant, a [http://about:blank T consultation, every single patient underwent] restaurant of any kind, a convenience store and grocery store or any retail facility within a 1600m residential network buffer, and the presence of a restaurant within 800m. Measures representing food accessibility demonstrated some inconsistent relationships with dietary outcomes. Among the 14 of 16 studies that examined distance to afood store in relation to diet, three revealed null associations [18,34,41]. Five of the remaining eleven studies showed associations but not always in a consistent direction [23,27,37,38,40]. For [http://s154.dzzj001.com/comment/html/?158917.html S own conception {of the|from the|in the|on] instance, Timperio et. al. [40] found that the likelihood of consuming vegetables > = 3 times/day was greater not only the farther children lived from a supermarket (OR = 1.27, 95  CI 1.07-1.51) and but also the farther children lived from FF outlet (OR = 1.19, 95  CI 1.06-1.35). Skidmore et al. [37] reported not only that living further away from a supermarket increased portions of fruit (0.11 portions/week/km increase, p