List of actions considered abusive - Historique des versions

Brennos : /* 4.2 It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed. */

2019-08-20T13:29:16Z

‎4.2 It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed.

Brennos : /* 4.2 It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed. */

2019-08-20T12:54:30Z

‎4.2 It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed.

Brennos : /* 4.2. It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed. */

2019-08-20T12:53:40Z

‎4.2. It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed.

Brennos : /* 4 ter. It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed. */

2019-08-20T12:53:31Z

‎4 ter. It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed.

Brennos : /* 4 ter. It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed. */

2019-08-20T12:52:08Z

‎4 ter. It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed.

Brennos le 20 août 2019 à 12:51

2019-08-20T12:51:28Z

Tisoon : Added link to the FAQ.

2019-07-17T10:51:22Z

Added link to the FAQ.

Tisoon le 29 juin 2019 à 08:05

2019-06-29T08:05:59Z

Tisoon : Updated intro, rules 3, 4, 4.1, 5 and 7

2019-06-29T08:04:17Z

Updated intro, rules 3, 4, 4.1, 5 and 7

Tisoon : Ajouts pour les règles 4bis et 5

2016-10-05T17:48:52Z

Ajouts pour les règles 4bis et 5

@@ Ligne 68 : / Ligne 68 : @@
 The admins' will is to have grouped wars in the terms exposed by this rule. Blocking an opponent or isolating from others is of course most of the times a viable tactic, only this above tactic is prohibited.
-== 4.2 It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed. ==
+== 4.2 It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Liege Lord who has been betrayed. ==
 To avoid any suspicion and facilitate the procedures in the event of a dispute, it is advisable to take a screenshot of any felony against you.

← Version précédente		Version du 20 août 2019 à 12:54
Ligne 74 :		Ligne 74 :

	'''Why this rule?'''		'''Why this rule?'''
		+
	A bug in the management of felony markers has appeared and no longer renders the felony obsolete in the event of loss of the Prestigious Title. This rule is intended to counter it and make disputes management easier.		A bug in the management of felony markers has appeared and no longer renders the felony obsolete in the event of loss of the Prestigious Title. This rule is intended to counter it and make disputes management easier.

@@ Ligne 68 : / Ligne 68 : @@
 The admins' will is to have grouped wars in the terms exposed by this rule. Blocking an opponent or isolating from others is of course most of the times a viable tactic, only this above tactic is prohibited.
-== 4.2. It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed. ==
+== 4.2 It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed. ==
 To avoid any suspicion and facilitate the procedures in the event of a dispute, it is advisable to take a screenshot of any felony against you.

@@ Ligne 68 : / Ligne 68 : @@
 The admins' will is to have grouped wars in the terms exposed by this rule. Blocking an opponent or isolating from others is of course most of the times a viable tactic, only this above tactic is prohibited.
-== 4 ter. It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed. ==
+== 4.2. It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed. ==
 To avoid any suspicion and facilitate the procedures in the event of a dispute, it is advisable to take a screenshot of any felony against you.

@@ Ligne 70 : / Ligne 70 : @@
 == 4 ter. It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed. ==
 To avoid any suspicion and facilitate the procedures in the event of a dispute, it is advisable to take a screenshot of any felony against you.
 '''Why this rule?'''

← Version précédente		Version du 20 août 2019 à 12:51
Ligne 67 :		Ligne 67 :

	The admins' will is to have grouped wars in the terms exposed by this rule. Blocking an opponent or isolating from others is of course most of the times a viable tactic, only this above tactic is prohibited.		The admins' will is to have grouped wars in the terms exposed by this rule. Blocking an opponent or isolating from others is of course most of the times a viable tactic, only this above tactic is prohibited.
		+
		+	== 4 ter. It is forbidden to declare a felony war if you are not the Suzerain who has been betrayed. ==
		+	To avoid any suspicion and facilitate the procedures in the event of a dispute, it is advisable to take a screenshot of any felony against you.
		+
		+	'''Why this rule?'''
		+	A bug in the management of felony markers has appeared and no longer renders the felony obsolete in the event of loss of the Prestigious Title. This rule is intended to counter it and make disputes management easier.

	== 5. During a war, it is forbidden to: ==		== 5. During a war, it is forbidden to: ==

← Version précédente		Version du 17 juillet 2019 à 10:51
Ligne 3 :		Ligne 3 :
	Finally, this list has been created to smooth relations between players in order to achieve the best gaming experience. So it only applies to active players.		Finally, this list has been created to smooth relations between players in order to achieve the best gaming experience. So it only applies to active players.

		+	This list is also completed by [http://www.marchofhistory.com/forums/index.php?/topic/5622-faq-about-rules-faq-sur-les-r%C3%A8gles/#entry46248 a FAQ] to help make things clearer.

	== 1. Create an account to come back in a March of History game from where we have been banned or we have left is forbidden. ==		== 1. Create an account to come back in a March of History game from where we have been banned or we have left is forbidden. ==

← Version précédente		Version du 29 juin 2019 à 08:05
Ligne 1 :		Ligne 1 :
	Here is the list of actions which often happen in March of History and are considered abusive (and can be punished by the referees and admins). Nonetheless, this list is not there to forbid actions, but prohibit actions in some specific situations. This list is ''non exhaustive''.		Here is the list of actions which often happen in March of History and are considered abusive (and can be punished by the referees and admins). Nonetheless, this list is not there to forbid actions, but prohibit actions in some specific situations. This list is ''non exhaustive''.
		+
	Finally, this list has been created to smooth relations between players in order to achieve the best gaming experience. So it only applies to active players.		Finally, this list has been created to smooth relations between players in order to achieve the best gaming experience. So it only applies to active players.

@@ Ligne 1 : / Ligne 1 : @@
-Here is the list of actions which often happen in March of History and are considered abusive (and can be punished by the referees and admins). This list is ''non exhaustive''.
+Here is the list of actions which often happen in March of History and are considered abusive (and can be punished by the referees and admins). Nonetheless, this list is not there to forbid actions, but prohibit actions in some specific situations. This list is ''non exhaustive''.
@@ Ligne 29 : / Ligne 30 : @@
 '''Why this rule?'''
-This tactic has been used several times to favor a side during a war, or at the beginning of a game to help a player build a large territory very quickly and recruit a lot of mercenaries to wipe out his neighbours.
+This tactic has been used several times to favor a side during a war, or a friend/ally, or at the beginning of a game to help a player to get a massive advantage.
-== 4. It's forbidden to declare war: ==
+== 4. It's forbidden to declare war notably: ==
 * to vassalise the titles of a friend who is vassal of an "embarassing" liege, but from who he doesn't want to be felon;
 * to declare a reconquest or felony to a friend to get his titles or lands which are already targeted by a war from a true enemy;
@@ Ligne 39 : / Ligne 40 : @@
 '''Why theses rules?'''
-The situations described here are ''non exhaustive''. This rule is about what is usually called the fake wars. It includes wars between friends to avoid some consequences from the treaties (felony, title gifts (see rule 5.), tactics to avoid war goals to be applied, etc), these wars are obviously forbidden.
+The situations described here are ''non exhaustive''. This rule is about what is usually called the fake wars, and also apply to wars joined. It is wars between friends to avoid some consequences from the treaties (felony, title gifts (see rule 5.), tactics to avoid war goals to be applied, etc.), these wars are obviously forbidden.
 == 4.1 It is forbidden to start "multiple wars". ==
@@ Ligne 45 : / Ligne 46 : @@
 That means aim each opponent in a separate war, preventing them to group together, or to prevent an ally or allies to join a war by declaring war to them.
-How do you know you will cause a multiple war? Answer to this question: am I already in war against an ally of my future enemy/enemies? If the answer is yes, then you have no right to declare war to your target or join the war of an ally.
+How do you know you will cause a multiple war? Answer to this question: am I already in war against an ally (vassal bond, mutual war and/or marriage) of my future enemy/enemies? If the answer is yes, then you have no right to declare war to your target or join the war of an ally.
@@ Ligne 63 : / Ligne 64 : @@
 '''Why this rule?'''
-Blocking an opponent or isolating from others is of course most of the times a viable tactic. However, the admins' will is to have grouped wars.
+The admins' will is to have grouped wars in the terms exposed by this rule. Blocking an opponent or isolating from others is of course most of the times a viable tactic, only this above tactic is prohibited.
 == 5. During a war, it is forbidden to: ==
-* give a title/city to an House not sharing all of your wars;
+* if you're in war: give a title/city to an House not sharing all of your wars;
 * give a city going to be sieged or currently under siege;
 * give a title vassal of a title aimed by a war;
-* modify the va(va)ssalages and liege of a title aimed by a war; as well as in the year following the end of the war;
+* keep troops from another House in a siege against its will;
-* receive a title making you ally of your enemy;
+* give a title vassal of a one targeted by a war;
-* place an army or armies not taking part in a war on any place to block troops taking part in the aforementioned war (a maritime path, for example);
+* modify the va(va)ssalages and liege of a title aimed by a war; as well as in the day following the end of the war;
-* intentionally use any method to prevent a clause from taking effect (for instance: bankruptcy so that one can't pay a tribute, keeping towns which should be given back, provoke the lost of one title aimed by a war and so on…).
+* place army not taking part in a war on any place to block troops taking part in the aforementioned war (a maritime path, for example); use neutral armies to slowdown/block moves from armies in war;
@@ Ligne 95 : / Ligne 98 : @@
 '''Why this rule?'''
-The transfer of titles has been designed as a bargaining chip. Using this possibility to declare war on a non-felon vassal or suzerain is abusing this design. As to use these gifts to be protected from another player.
+The transfer of titles has been designed as a bargaining chip. Using this possibility to get an advantage without consent of the bond player is abusing this design.
 == Nota Bene ==
 This list is a compilation of the actions which are most often witnessed and will get additions if need be. However, keep in mind that an attitude disrespecting ''fair-play'', or any abusive behaviour, will be punished by the referee, even if it is not listed here. Do not forget either that it is up to you to correct an unintentional abusive situation that you caused and that a punishment can and will be applied if you refuse to do so.

@@ Ligne 51 : / Ligne 51 : @@
 How can I do if I want that Paul, ally of my enemy and blocking the path, joins the war? If I declare him war, there is "multiple wars". So what can I do? Only one solution: ultimatum.
 The ultimatum is a private message sent to the target giving him 36 hours to join the so-called war. A copy of the ultimatum is sent by ticket to the referees.
 The ultimatum urges to join a war in which the target can be effectively invited (the target is directly allied with one of the war protagonists).
 The ultimatum is sent by a protagonist of the war.
 If after 36 hours (from the message sending) the target has not joined the so-called war, you are authorised to declare him war.
@@ Ligne 67 : / Ligne 71 : @@
 * give a title vassal of a title aimed by a war;
 * modify the va(va)ssalages and liege of a title aimed by a war; as well as in the year following the end of the war;
 * place an army or armies not taking part in a war on any place to block troops taking part in the aforementioned war (a maritime path, for example);
 * intentionally use any method to prevent a clause from taking effect (for instance: bankruptcy so that one can't pay a tribute, keeping towns which should be given back, provoke the lost of one title aimed by a war and so on…).